Skip to main content

a list about winners of the national book award

The National Book Awards are a set of American literary awards. Started in 1950, the awards are presented annually to American authors for literature published in the prior year, as well as lifetime achievement awards including the "Medal of Distinguished Contribution to American Letters" and the "Literarian Award" The purpose of the awards is "to celebrate the best of American literature, to expand its audience, and to enhance the cultural value of good writing in America.
It's more or lesson the American version of the Booker Prize. This list takes into account the fiction category only.Quick two line summaries as usual.Haven't read any of the winners after 1985, so knowledge of this subject is not as good.

9.The World According to Garp - John Irving- Won in 1980





























why read it: A comedy , which is all the more surprising considering the dark elements of the story. Major plot elements and themes center on feminism and sexuality, with large parts of the book itself being reflective of John Irving's early career.

8. The Wapshot Chronicle - John Cheever -won in 1958























why read it: A novel set in a fishing village in the New England coast, which describes the daily life of a somewhat strange family. At times it is humorous but with the humour that comes only when coupled with underlying seriousness.



7. A Fable - William Faulkner - Won in 1955




























why read it: More proof that the 1950's produced a lot of quality American Literature. Faulkner himself considered it his masterpiece. A story set during World War I which tries to show the nature of war and the human nature of those who are in it.

6.The Adventures of Augie March -Saul Bellow - Won in 1954

































why read it: Another novel about trying to find yourself. Written in the picaresque style generally used for a story of a drifter, the novel is essentially a nod to the American dream-Augie March makes his way up in the world with nothing but luck and skill.
5.The Moviegoer - Walker Percy - Won in 1962










































why read it: About post war trauma and alienation. An existentialist novel about searching for someone to relate to while constantly being asked to figure out what exactly you're doing. Anyone who likes quiet alone time should relate to this book, at least a bit.

4.Herzog - Saul Bellow - Won in 1965























why read it: A throw back to the letter style novels of British Literature. The description of a midlife crisis and with the regular Bellow style, the analysis of the emotions that go with it. Much of the novel is focused on his relationships with other people and through the letters (which he never sends), actually his relationship with himself.

3. White Noise - Don DeLillo - won in 1985





























why read it: Part a satire on family life with absurdist leanings. Part a look into mortality, fear of death and reality merging (and being replaced) by simulation. A realistic look into the consumerism, conspiracy theories and media frenzies of the 1970's and 1980's.

2.
Invisible Man - Ralph Ellison -Won in 1953




























why read it: A book about the underdog being invisible. Representative of the struggles faced by Black Americans in the first half of the 20th Century, both in the South and in New York. An inside view on Black Nationalism and also to what extent personal identity can be found.



1. Gravity's Rainbow - Thomas Pynchon - Won in 1974



































why read it: Very complicated and probably will take most people multiple readings to sort it all out. There's information from many different specialties, all of it in high detail. More than that the novel breaks boundaries and forces thought to go along channels it wouldn't normally go.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

a list about plays (post 1950)

The general perception is good plays stopped being written. That all the plays being performed which remain popular are classics and there is no place for the playwright in the current dramatic world. The role of the playwright has been diminished but good plays have not become extinct in the 20th and 21st century.This list will attempt to reflect that by giving a selection of excellent plays written (and performed) after 1950. 20. Prelude to a Kiss- Craig Lucas. Premiered in California in 1988. Quick Description: Thought to be a metaphor for AIDS. A story about the switching of bodies between a new bride and an old man and how the husband must find the old man while keeping his love alive. Something of a Sci-fi style and one of the most original works in recent times. 19. Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill.premiered in Stockholm at the Royal Dramatic theatre in 1956. quick summary: A play about addiction and how it affects everyone around the addict.The characters ...

Travel Writings- Rome (I)

Rome is a cliché. Usually that isn’t a good thing but when the cliché is that a city is cool, full of life and gorgeous, the clichés can stay. Rome is possibly the only European capital that can claim to rival Paris in the popular imagination in terms of having an expectation around it. Even Paris is now succumbing to parallel narratives due to the sheer size of the city (much like London), with the immigrant experience less of an unknown story (to non-immigrants anyway. Immigrants always knew it wasn’t cities paved with gold they’d find). Some combination of smaller population, less immigration and the weight of centuries of civilization being still visible across the city has allowed Rome to actually deserve the tag of “The Eternal City”.   My idea of Rome comes to me primarily from Italian films of the 1960s. Rome is black and white in my mind just as it is on Fellini’s film reel. I had low expectations. Months in London had allowed cynicism to set in...