Skip to main content

Purity by Jonathan Franzen - A review

Purity





The newest novel by Jonathan Franzen is the kind of novel which an author can only write when previous success has occurred. Without that track record of reliability or quality, the editors would have given the book much greater scrutiny. Purity suffers badly from a lack of editing.

The main character is nominally the recent college graduate Purity, nicknamed Pip, though the Julian Assange-like figure of Andreas Wolf steals the spotlight as soon as he appears. The best of the entire novel is set in East Berlin and if more of the focus of the novel was spent on Wolf, it’s possible the novel would have been far more entertaining. The parts with Wolf are not without flaws, however, especially as the character’s repeated stating of his devotion to his mother and love for his past partner, are his motivations begins to seem less plausible as the book goes on. The other main character, Tom Aberrant, an editor at Denver Independent, gives us the most emotional parts of the book but the hysterics in his diary makes one feel as though one is reading the most banal remembrances. Purity herself sometimes seems like a description of the problems of millenials than an actual person.

The entire book is sprawling and ambitious yet primarily character focused, as would be expected from the author. In fact, the summary of the plotline(s) actually seem like the logical expansion that Franzen would next attempt. It brings in Berlin during the era of two Germanys, subject that the author would know from up close during his time at Freie Universität Berlin. His distaste for the internet pervading into all aspects of life is also previously documented in his essays and the idea to spin this as a parallel to the era of the Stasi is actually quite clever.

The main issue with the book lies not with the concepts but the execution. Too many characters exist in the book that contribute nothing or, even worse, contribute just enough to seem interesting and then disappear. There are several stories that go nowhere at all, such as the journalism piece about a missing nuclear weapon which gives us one of the more interesting characters in the novel in Leila. Leila has claim to be the realistic character in the book. Pip, barely seems more than a blend of what millennial are supposed to be like and her mother is almost a parody of an idealistic feminist (as well as a parody of neurotic mothers and child of the rich). The author’s previous works such as The Corrections and Freedom were also dominated by idealistic characters (especially in Freedom with Patty but also The Corrections, as Alfred’s reserve and adherence to mid-Western style values is one of the primary structures of the book), but they managed to feel like real people with ideas and not composites of various ideologies.

People do exist with several motivating ideologies which swirl in them and are never resolved because of the difficulty of ideology in real life. But a novel is not real life and the author should put forth a viewpoint that is compelling. Even if the viewpoint that turns out to be compelling is that life is confusing. But the confusion of the story is not designed by the author and comes from incoherence, not design.

The main threads of the story do interact and there are unexpected links between Wolf, Pip and Tom. But these links never seem to ring true. The coincidences are wholly implausible and when later on in the novel we find out they are not coincidences, it’s been hundreds of pages since we already knew. The book gives the uncomfortable in-between of presenting us with the idea that the power of the information era brought the people together but states it slowly throughout the novel. Tom’s meeting with Wolf is plausible but Wolf’s motivation for obsession with Tom is thing. The entire rise of Wolf to the leader he is seems either underdeveloped or told in too much of a rush.


The novel is filled with brilliant ideas and a compelling plot. The characters have potential and Franzen has shown us a world which is much like our own. With better editing and perhaps a bit more work on the characters, it could have been another masterpiece. The man who wrote The Corrections certainly knows how to create one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

best comedians of the decade

criteria : must do stand-up comedy. only judged from stand up and sketch . 10.Demetri Martin why: He likes constructing palindromes. That's reason enough. Uses all sorts of visual aids and sketches. Great with the one liners too. Most unconventional comedian since Gallagher.Maybe. 9. Russell Brand why: Obnoxious, loud and very strange. Known as much for his off stage antics than his comedy. But one of the best young 'angry' comedians out there. Although there's a sneaking suspicion the accent makes him cool (er). 8. Robin Williams why: Back in2002 with LIVE on Broadway, the show broke several records for a comedy show. Showed he's still funny, hasn't let success go to his head and can still make it all up on the spot. 7. Ricky Gervais why: In the Office for the first part of the century, everywhere else for the last. Most people know him for his film roles, but he's great on the stage too. Doesn't shy away from the controversial topics. And it isn't

Best Films of the Decade - 2010s - Third Part

11. Get Out (2017)-  Directed and written by  Jordan Peele. Horror seems to be an excellent medium to describe racism and it's somewhat amazing how obvious it seems in hindsight. One of the best debuts of a director in recent times, with a script that amps up the tension marvelously and serves up a twist in the tale that was impossible to see coming. Normally horror movies are seen as niche, but this film was popular with the wide audience and also at the award ceremonies further proving everyone was able to be captured by the film's quality. There has been talk of the film fitting into horror-comedy, probably due to Peele's comedy background, but while it is never laughably funny but does serve as a clever satire on the state of racial affairs. 12. The Death of Stalin (2017) - Directed by  Armando Iannuci.  Written by  Armando Iannuci, David Schneider and Ian Martin. Few topics are as ripe for satire as the workings of communist governments (provided one can

Best Films of the Decade - 2010s - Second Part

As always, a giant list. The first 10 can be pretty much interchangeable depending on my mood. 21.  John Wick (2014) - Directed by  Chad Stalehski . Written by  Derek Kolstad.   Keanu Reeves already had experience as the face of an action franchise but it's possible in the future that we remember more for John Wick than as Neo. A film that came out of almost nowhere and managed to simultaneously be a homage and a way forward for action movies. Building off of an extensive source of knowledge of the films of John Woo, Jean Pierre Melville, anime and spaghetti westerns, it's the closest anyone has come to replicating the Gun-Fu Hong Kong classics. The well crafted world of John Wick keeps expanding too, with even more additions to the series in the works. Long may it continue. 22.  Blade Runner 2049 (2017) - Directed by  Denis Villeneuve . Written by  Michael Green  and  Hampton Fancher.   A sequel to one of the most beloved and acclaimed sci-film films of