Skip to main content

A Strangeness in My Mind- A Review

A Strangeness in My Mind



A Strangeness in my Mind, the latest novel from Orhan Pamuk, is another of the author’s many odes to Istanbul. The novel touches on familiar ground for the writer, not the least of which being the city he grew up in. It also addresses the conflict between secular and religious groups in Turkey, as in his earlier novel Snow. It references heavily on the gap between the rich and the poor as in the novel The Museum of Innocence.

Like all of Pamuk’s novels the structure is very postmodern, and the characters regularly address the reader directly. This may be the most overtly religious novel since Snow and while Snow had religion as a central them, the main character was not religious. The main character, Mevlut, who is a boza seller primarily but has a succession of unskilled jobs throughout the novel, is a religious man who worries about problems of a religious nature regularly.

Women’s honor is less of a central theme than in The Museum of Innocence  but Pamuk still touches upon the importance of marriage before sex in Turkish society. Also, the honor of men who feel themselves betrayed either by potential suitors or by their female relatives’ actions can be seen as a major influence on the plot.

This is the first novel from Pamuk that deals with immigration to Istanbul. Mevlut is an immigrant from rural Anatolia and has a firsthand view of life on the outskirts of Istanbul until the sprawl begins to bring the outskirts of Istanbul into the interior. Mevlut’s varied jobs give him a presence in several areas of the city and so the story is not only of immigration but also of local contrast. And by setting the story in the outskirts amongst the immigrants to the capital, Pamuk is able to portray a cross-section of the wider Turkey.

The main character is Mevlut but regularly it feels as though it is Istanbul. Parts of the novel come across almost as a funeral speech for a close friend or of close friends speaking about another who has passed away.

The book itself suffers from a bit of unwieldiness, as it has the size of an epic but not the fluidity of one. The sections sometimes feel more like a travel guide merged with a history book, and then had personal histories inserted at random. In general, this haphazard structure is enjoyable but it does not make it particularly easy to really get deep into the book. While never dull, the book does seem to meander along.  

Pamuk remains one of the few writers who can write a love story without it being dull or cliché. While the novel never drifts into cliché, large parts of the story feel almost pre-ordained. This could be due to overfamiliarity with the author’s work, as there are quite a few surprises embedded in there. But somehow the overall effect of the novel seems like a bit of tighter editing was need. Especially as the last sections of the novel seem much more rushed and glossed over.  


Unlike the author’s best novels Snow and My Name is Red this one does not match the intensely researched and deeply introspective storytelling of those. However it still manages to be a very good novel and could quite possibly be a platform (like The Silent House) for readers new to Pamuk. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

(Short) Analysis of the (length of stay for) teams at World Cup 2014 - Groups A and B

I like World Cup, quite a lot, and think it's the best of all the tournaments that exist in football and very possibly in all of sport (at least for any tournament focused on one sport since the Olympics is amazing because of the variety). So I'll be trying to figure out how likely each team is to get out of the group stages and how far they'll probably go if they do. All the odds are from  www.bet365.com  which is the site I use most for trend spotting in sport (it's like my sport-Bloomberg). Group A Brazil- Automatically qualified as hosts and at 1/20 to qualify have the second best odds of any team to make it out of the group phase behind Argentina (who have probably the softest group). It's with good reason Brazil have such low odds and they're considered favourites. Winning or even coming second in Group A doesn't mean an easy run as it probably would result in a round of sixteen clash against either defending champions Spain or the ...

Best Films of the Decade - 2010s - Third Part

11. Get Out (2017)-  Directed and written by  Jordan Peele. Horror seems to be an excellent medium to describe racism and it's somewhat amazing how obvious it seems in hindsight. One of the best debuts of a director in recent times, with a script that amps up the tension marvelously and serves up a twist in the tale that was impossible to see coming. Normally horror movies are seen as niche, but this film was popular with the wide audience and also at the award ceremonies further proving everyone was able to be captured by the film's quality. There has been talk of the film fitting into horror-comedy, probably due to Peele's comedy background, but while it is never laughably funny but does serve as a clever satire on the state of racial affairs. 12. The Death of Stalin (2017) - Directed by  Armando Iannuci.  Written by  Armando Iannuci, David Schneider and Ian Martin. Few topics are as ripe for satire as the workings of communist governments (provi...