Skip to main content

Two Years, Eight Months and Twenty‑Eight Nights by Salman Rushdie - review

Two Years, Eight Months and Twenty‑Eight Nights by Salman Rushdie - review 






Salman Rushdie’s name on the cover of a book comes with baggage. Because of the history of the author’s previous works, there’s the inevitable desire to compare with the old books. Midnight’s Children especially weighs upon all of the author’s work because of the stature of that novel.
However, it’s not just comparison but expectation. The reader expects the protagonist to be from the subcontinent and the novel to be peppered with historical and contemporary references. There is the expectation that the novel will reference and compare Eastern and Western histories. The historical fiction is expected to be accompanied by magical realism. These expectations can also weigh in on the evaluation of Rushdie’s new novel. And, if the reader is expecting to find all those things, they won’t be disappointed.

Two Years, Eight Months and Twenty‑Eight Nights is an unwieldy name which references the 1001 nights needed to tell the stories of Arabian nights. With that reference it’s obvious where the historical references of the story are going to come from.  Like the Arabian nights, the book is less a novel than a series of tales.

Rushdie does not self-reference as heavily as other novelists (Phillip Roth and Orhan Pamuk, for example) but the novel is clearly influenced by his life in America. The book is primarily concerned with fragmentation and conflict which are recurring themes for Rushdie but it’s the first time he’s had these themes in an American setting.

The tales of book are about several different characters, both historical and contemporary and human and jinn. Thus the novel can feel a bit unfinished at times. It’s possible this was the intention of the author but it feels as though the structure could possibly have been made into more. Famous historical philosophers Ibn Rush and Ghazali are the two primary characters and their cross-century conflict underpins the entire story.

Mr. Geronimo is the strongest character in the book who actually has a compelling backstory and seems to exist in reality (although a reality which makes less and less sense to him). Too many characters feel like cameo roles or unnecessary additions.  The character or Jinendra feels like an uncessary addition, while characters like the Mayor and the Lady philosopher feel like they had potential but were never fleshed out.

The book is fuelled by ideas more than characters, which is unfortunate. Some of the most memorable characters in recent literature have been Rushdie’s protagonist Saleem Sinai in Midnight’s Children and Haroun in Haroun and the Sea of Stories. This novel felt as though more time developing the characters than the ideas would have resulted in a more enjoyable experience.

The abundance of switching between tales and periods usually isn’t a probably for Rushdie but this time the flow is broken enough to lose the reader’s attention. It’s possible that the focus on a central character (perhaps Mr. Geronimo whose scenes are most realistic) would have saved the book from being too formless. The abundance of ideas has come at the cost of the development of the world of the novel itself which is left vague. While it becomes clear that the grand theme is about reason and religion ( Ibn Rushd and Ghazali are main characters, after all) the clarity comes at the cost of feeling that one is reading a lecture and not a story.


The book itself has a lot of potential and occasional cameos of brilliance. But in total it never really managed to get going and become more than just a sum of sketches of varying appeal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

a list about plays (post 1950)

The general perception is good plays stopped being written. That all the plays being performed which remain popular are classics and there is no place for the playwright in the current dramatic world. The role of the playwright has been diminished but good plays have not become extinct in the 20th and 21st century.This list will attempt to reflect that by giving a selection of excellent plays written (and performed) after 1950. 20. Prelude to a Kiss- Craig Lucas. Premiered in California in 1988. Quick Description: Thought to be a metaphor for AIDS. A story about the switching of bodies between a new bride and an old man and how the husband must find the old man while keeping his love alive. Something of a Sci-fi style and one of the most original works in recent times. 19. Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill.premiered in Stockholm at the Royal Dramatic theatre in 1956. quick summary: A play about addiction and how it affects everyone around the addict.The characters ...

Travel Writings- Rome (I)

Rome is a cliché. Usually that isn’t a good thing but when the cliché is that a city is cool, full of life and gorgeous, the clichés can stay. Rome is possibly the only European capital that can claim to rival Paris in the popular imagination in terms of having an expectation around it. Even Paris is now succumbing to parallel narratives due to the sheer size of the city (much like London), with the immigrant experience less of an unknown story (to non-immigrants anyway. Immigrants always knew it wasn’t cities paved with gold they’d find). Some combination of smaller population, less immigration and the weight of centuries of civilization being still visible across the city has allowed Rome to actually deserve the tag of “The Eternal City”.   My idea of Rome comes to me primarily from Italian films of the 1960s. Rome is black and white in my mind just as it is on Fellini’s film reel. I had low expectations. Months in London had allowed cynicism to set in...