Skip to main content

Travel Writing- Constanta




Constanta lies around two hours east of Bucharest, on the Black Sea. With a foundation date of 800 B.C., it is the oldest continuously inhabited city in Romania. Formerly one of the largest ports in Europe, the container traffic has reduced since its heyday in the 1990s but it remains the largest port on the Black Sea.



Conversations with locals have confirmed the suspicion that the population of the city varies greatly with the season. In the spring and summer the population of Constanta swells significantly, especially on the weekends, by people flocking to the beaches and boardwalks.



When I visited in March, the presence of tourists was not immediately obvious. The rail station lies about 2 km from the waterfront (about 7 lei by taxi) and has the feel of a building that has seen no changes at all for several years. This is a building which doesn’t feel neglected or unkempt in any way but one that’s static.

The largest building on the boardwalk of Constanta is the casino. The most noticeable thing about this building is not that it’s impressive size but how much more impressive it must have been when it was in its prime. Now, the building seems more like a ruin from ancient times than anything as modern as a casino.



The entire city seems to exist in a state of decay. Not ruins but the sense that the best days had gone and were never coming back. Almost as if the city had stopped caring enough to update itself after it realized things were no longer going well. I might be reading far too much into a quiet spring day in the city and it’s possible coming in summer would mean visiting a vibrant waterfront. But even if so, it just means the decay of the city is just stasis. That it only comes alive in summer.



At the end of the boardwalk are a multitude of restaurants built near the docks which specialize in fish and seafood dishes. These are one of the only places in Constanta that I’d found to be new and updated. With menus in English as well as Romanian, I imagine that they also cater to tourists. All the restaurants were housed in tiny shacks that reminded me of Scheveningen in The Hague.



One of the most noticeable buildings in Constanta is the Grand Mosque. With its tall minaret and distinct Byzantine architecture, it certainly seems like a relic from the past eras of Ottoman rule. Hence I was very surprised to learn that the mosque was only built in 1911.
Romania does not have a large proportion of Muslims. Despite more than 700 years of Ottoman rule in the region around Constanta, there are very few symbols of the Islamic influence.  The inscription on the plaque at the Grand Mosque state that the building was built as a gift for the Muslim workers in the region. However, there is also the Hunchiar mosque in the city, which is also regularly used by the Turkish minority there.



The communist era in Romania prioritized secularism and atheist beliefs, leading to decline in the religious heritage of Romania. Despite this, in Constanta as in Bucharest, several striking religious monuments remain. The St. Paul and Peter Orthodox Church stands near to the boardwalk and is distinctive with its pressed brick walls and metallic domes.



Ovid Square is the main square of Constanta and is flanked by the Archeology museum and several other impressive buildings. Matching its name, the archeology museum seems to be approaching a state of ruin with several signs around stating to beware of falling debris. Despite this neglect it remains an impressive sight.




Off of Ovid square are many smaller streets which are packed with bars and pubs which seem to cater more to tourists.Even the everpresent Irish pub can be found. 

Continuing in this direction brings one again to the Black Sea albeit on a sandier and wider expanse than on the side of the port. Also overlooking the black sea is a Greek church, which is worth viewing despite its small size. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

a list about plays (post 1950)

The general perception is good plays stopped being written. That all the plays being performed which remain popular are classics and there is no place for the playwright in the current dramatic world. The role of the playwright has been diminished but good plays have not become extinct in the 20th and 21st century.This list will attempt to reflect that by giving a selection of excellent plays written (and performed) after 1950. 20. Prelude to a Kiss- Craig Lucas. Premiered in California in 1988. Quick Description: Thought to be a metaphor for AIDS. A story about the switching of bodies between a new bride and an old man and how the husband must find the old man while keeping his love alive. Something of a Sci-fi style and one of the most original works in recent times. 19. Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill.premiered in Stockholm at the Royal Dramatic theatre in 1956. quick summary: A play about addiction and how it affects everyone around the addict.The characters ...

Travel Writings- Rome (I)

Rome is a cliché. Usually that isn’t a good thing but when the cliché is that a city is cool, full of life and gorgeous, the clichés can stay. Rome is possibly the only European capital that can claim to rival Paris in the popular imagination in terms of having an expectation around it. Even Paris is now succumbing to parallel narratives due to the sheer size of the city (much like London), with the immigrant experience less of an unknown story (to non-immigrants anyway. Immigrants always knew it wasn’t cities paved with gold they’d find). Some combination of smaller population, less immigration and the weight of centuries of civilization being still visible across the city has allowed Rome to actually deserve the tag of “The Eternal City”.   My idea of Rome comes to me primarily from Italian films of the 1960s. Rome is black and white in my mind just as it is on Fellini’s film reel. I had low expectations. Months in London had allowed cynicism to set in...