Skip to main content

Suicide Squad: A review




Suicide Squad seems to be an attempt from DC to make a film that’s more subversive and nihilistic than its previous releases. It’s inevitable that comparisons with Marvel films be made and the closest comparison for Suicide Squad seems to be that it would try to capture (some of) the feeling of Marvel’s Deadpool. One of the recurring criticisms of Batman v Superman was that the tone was far too dark and depressing. DC seems to have overcorrected in this film by going too much for quirky.
 
In a film where the squad is meant to be anti-heroes and “the worst of the worst”, it’s telling that the only character who seems even slightly scary is Federal Agent Amanda Waller. Waller, played by Viola Davis and Jared Leto’s Joker are easily the strongest characters in the film closely followed by Margot Robbie’s Harley Quinn. The problem is that the film is filled with characters all competition for screen time and as most of them are badly written or just caricatures, a lot of the film feels like you’re waiting for someone worthwhile to get onto the screen. Many characters feel like they’ve been added as throwaway bits and the entire film serves as an example of the worst of superstar casting.



The pacing of the film is eclectic in a way that serves to make the already muddled plot seem even more haphazard. Flashbacks are a regular occurrence during the film and while they appear to be there with the intention of making us aware of the motivations of the main characters they don’t  add anything other than an unnecessary break taking attention away from the (already dull) main plot. Timing and pacing seem to be a problem for this director with the attempts at comedy falling flat or jarring. Harley Quinn was a rarity in this film by being a character with a bit of personality but the deployment of her comedic lines too often felt annoying more than clever.



The film’s villains also suffer from a lack of personality (they are in the main, literally faceless) and the action scenes are about as exciting as watching someone else play a side-scrolling video game. The mission and villains seem like someone grabbed them from the first available comic book. There were surely better options for this film in terms of a plot that fit.

Lack of personality is the one thing not present in Jared Leto’s Joker. However, he’s totally wasted in the sidelines of the film. One would think that with the continual presence of Joker in all the marketing for the film he’d have a greater role but apparently someone decided one of the most popular characters in the DC universe needed less screen time than Rick Flag. On another note, Leto’s Joker is closer to Batman:Animated Series than Heath Ledger’s and possibly the right style for the rest of the characters was that of the animated series.



The film is bad in a lazy way. With a convoluted plot and poorly written characters, adding bad editing and overused racial stereotypes other further sends the film into the irredeemable failure category instead of the ambitious failure ones. A compendium of action with no point serving as punctuation for a barrage of empty scenes set to (an admittedly impressive) soundtrack of classic tunes could be the summary of this film.

Will Smith has been the most bankable actor of the last 20 years and has the ability and personality to be golden in action-comedy films but is he really first-choice to be cast as a ruthless hitman? Or did the producers just find the most bankable actor and ignore any other logic? If the action-comedy tone of the film had actually worked, I doubt that question would ever arise.




At the time of writing Suicide Squad has already made $257 million at the box office, so it’s well clear of the $175 million budget it racked up. In my opinion, Suicide Squad was guaranteed to make money and draw crowds just because of the popularity of summer superhero films, ratings and quality aside. Unfortunately the creators of the film seemed to follow exactly that same logic in creating the film and decided they didn’t need to try too hard since they’d be covered anyway.  It’s the film equivalent of a participation trophy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

a list about plays (post 1950)

The general perception is good plays stopped being written. That all the plays being performed which remain popular are classics and there is no place for the playwright in the current dramatic world. The role of the playwright has been diminished but good plays have not become extinct in the 20th and 21st century.This list will attempt to reflect that by giving a selection of excellent plays written (and performed) after 1950. 20. Prelude to a Kiss- Craig Lucas. Premiered in California in 1988. Quick Description: Thought to be a metaphor for AIDS. A story about the switching of bodies between a new bride and an old man and how the husband must find the old man while keeping his love alive. Something of a Sci-fi style and one of the most original works in recent times. 19. Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill.premiered in Stockholm at the Royal Dramatic theatre in 1956. quick summary: A play about addiction and how it affects everyone around the addict.The characters ...

Travel Writings- Rome (I)

Rome is a cliché. Usually that isn’t a good thing but when the cliché is that a city is cool, full of life and gorgeous, the clichés can stay. Rome is possibly the only European capital that can claim to rival Paris in the popular imagination in terms of having an expectation around it. Even Paris is now succumbing to parallel narratives due to the sheer size of the city (much like London), with the immigrant experience less of an unknown story (to non-immigrants anyway. Immigrants always knew it wasn’t cities paved with gold they’d find). Some combination of smaller population, less immigration and the weight of centuries of civilization being still visible across the city has allowed Rome to actually deserve the tag of “The Eternal City”.   My idea of Rome comes to me primarily from Italian films of the 1960s. Rome is black and white in my mind just as it is on Fellini’s film reel. I had low expectations. Months in London had allowed cynicism to set in...