Skip to main content

Consider the fans

In the 4th ODI played in Barbados yesterday England performed with ability that they had not previously shown any indication of possessing. The win was as convincing as their loss was complete in the 3rd ODI and it was surely fitting that it was their captain, Andrew Strauss, who played the important innings. More than just a chance to restore pride, this was no irrelevant victory since with this win England have now draw level in the series . This makes the 5th ODI in St. Lucia on Friday the decisive match.

Surely now the possible boycott of the 5th ODI cannot now happen as it would forfeit the match and give the series to England. Common sense should dictate that this match should go on unhindered but this would only be true if cricket is indeed the first priority. WIPA and the WICB have been down this road before and as everyone who had followed the game in the Caribbean knows, nothing can be ruled out as impossible.

If the West Indies had won the 4th ODI than they would have attained an unassailable 3-1 lead in the series, making the 5th ODI a meaningless match in terms of the determination of the trophy. The players would then have no issue in the boycott of the match since they would be able to prove their point after winning the series. This English win leaves the series open but may have opened the avenue for the possibility of WIPA making an even stronger statement.

If WIPA are really determined that the issues which they stand for are the priority then they should, in theory, remain prepared to boycott regardless of the state of the series. In fact they may even be in a stronger position to bargain now, as they can effectively control whether there will even be a contest for the series of if the trophy is handed to England without even an attempt to win it.

The points on which the WICB and WIPA differ have not changed. They are still in disputes over payment for previous tours, payment for player injuries and medical bills and retainer contracts. Either side insists that the other is to blame and the deadlock usually involves a court arbitration to resolve. The resolution of these issues have been time consuming in the past and nothing suggests that it will not be so again.

If the last ODI is indeed boycotted it will serve very little point other than to state WIPA are unwilling to back down, even for the sake of the series. It will also give the WICB ammunition to the argument that they are concerned more about the cricket and WIPA are concerned more about their own affairs. If WIPA state that they are going to boycott unless some resolution is made and none comes to fruition then the WICB risk looking as though they care more about maintaining their position than reaching an agreement.

If the match is boycotted, there will be no winner. The West Indian players will have lost the series. Both the WIPA and WICB will have lost credibility and their ability to represent and administrate respectively should be seriously called into question.

Most of all it is the fans who lose. West Indian fans have not had a lot to celebrate in the past years. The size of crowds as well as the energy of the fans show the importance of good results and how long the crowds have waited to see them. At this time, when fans should be given something to celebrate after years of faithful support it is unfortunate that off field matters should be given a priority. Whatever the result of the discussions between the WICB and WIPA , once cricket matches in the West Indies continue to be overshadowed by disputes , then it is only those who love the game that will suffer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

a list about plays (post 1950)

The general perception is good plays stopped being written. That all the plays being performed which remain popular are classics and there is no place for the playwright in the current dramatic world. The role of the playwright has been diminished but good plays have not become extinct in the 20th and 21st century.This list will attempt to reflect that by giving a selection of excellent plays written (and performed) after 1950. 20. Prelude to a Kiss- Craig Lucas. Premiered in California in 1988. Quick Description: Thought to be a metaphor for AIDS. A story about the switching of bodies between a new bride and an old man and how the husband must find the old man while keeping his love alive. Something of a Sci-fi style and one of the most original works in recent times. 19. Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill.premiered in Stockholm at the Royal Dramatic theatre in 1956. quick summary: A play about addiction and how it affects everyone around the addict.The characters ...

Travel Writings- Rome (I)

Rome is a cliché. Usually that isn’t a good thing but when the cliché is that a city is cool, full of life and gorgeous, the clichés can stay. Rome is possibly the only European capital that can claim to rival Paris in the popular imagination in terms of having an expectation around it. Even Paris is now succumbing to parallel narratives due to the sheer size of the city (much like London), with the immigrant experience less of an unknown story (to non-immigrants anyway. Immigrants always knew it wasn’t cities paved with gold they’d find). Some combination of smaller population, less immigration and the weight of centuries of civilization being still visible across the city has allowed Rome to actually deserve the tag of “The Eternal City”.   My idea of Rome comes to me primarily from Italian films of the 1960s. Rome is black and white in my mind just as it is on Fellini’s film reel. I had low expectations. Months in London had allowed cynicism to set in...