Skip to main content

wi vs bangladesh - 1st test - an uncertainty

Considering the uncertainties surrounding the staging of the 1st test between the West Indies and Bangladesh tomorrow it would be extremely naïve to try to write a preview. Conflicting and sometimes even contradicting reports suggest that anything from a complete player boycott to a second-string side being played. All the while the WICB maintain that “They are confident that there will be a Test match on Thursday”.

If this is frustrating to those who only intended to watch the game on television imagine how much more so it must be for the fans in St. Vincent. In a ground that has only had one previous Test match, 12 years ago against Sri Lanka, the local fans would have surely been eager to see the return of Test cricket to the island. Ticket sales were sure to have been high, considering the fact that the West Indies were expected to win the series. The fans now are left with the dilemma of whether to even go to the ground, bearing in mind that the match may not even be played.

The reports that a second-string team would be played has neither been confirmed by the WICB or WIPA and the information that has emerged has come from St. Vincent. If the WICB have managed to find players to make up a team for the 1st Test on such short notice they would consider that they have done their job in providing a team. But would such a team even be worthy of the name of ‘the West Indian Test team’? Obviously it is the requirement of every Test nation to put out its strongest team and resolving issues to make the strongest team available is an integral part of the board’s responsibilities.

If the match is played tomorrow, regardless of whether a full strength team is played or not, it is obvious that there are issues that must be dealt with fully. So far it seems that there have been only partial remedies to the issues that the WICB and WIPA differ upon, and it is obvious that these partial methods are continuously failing.

The statement from WIPA president Dinanath Ramnarine is that "The players have played their last four tournaments without a contract. They are now being asked to play their fifth consecutive series without a contract, which is highly unacceptable.” Considering how likely injuries are for professional athletes it does not seem like too much to ask. In fact, it is surprising that there is not some legal concept which makes certain of continued payment once injury is sustained on international duty.

As always payment of fees remains an issue with WIPA making it known that settlement of payments on the concluded tour of West Indies tour to England (2009) and on the ICC 20/20 World Cup (2009) are issues. Taking into account that these professional sportsmen depend on such payments to make a living then there can be no valid reason for holding back on the payment of fees. Even if the WICB have financial difficulty then they should make a statement to that effect or at least take the time to explain to the players instead of leaving them in the dark.

The last time West Indian players boycotted a series was in the 2005 tour to Sri Lanka but the shadow of a boycott has been present over several series, the last of which being England’s tour of the Caribbean. The matches in Sri Lanka were played with a makeshift team and the West Indies lost both matches comprehensively. No one in the Caribbean wants to see anything approaching such drastic measures again.

If the match is boycotted, there will be no winner. The West Indian players will have sacrificed the series, regardless of the importance of their cause. While if another team is made up the series will lack the integrity it should have. Both the WIPA and WICB will have lost credibility and their ability to represent and administrate respectively should be seriously called into question.

Most of all it is the fans who lose. West Indian fans have not had a lot to celebrate in the past years. The size of crowds as well as the energy of the fans in the last series against England (in the Caribbean) show the importance of good results and how long the crowds have waited to see them. At this time, when fans should be given something to celebrate after years of faithful support it is unfortunate that off field matters should be given a priority. Whatever the result of the discussions between the WICB and WIPA , once cricket matches in the West Indies continue to be overshadowed by disputes , then it is only those who love the game that will suffer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

best comedians of the decade

criteria : must do stand-up comedy. only judged from stand up and sketch . 10.Demetri Martin why: He likes constructing palindromes. That's reason enough. Uses all sorts of visual aids and sketches. Great with the one liners too. Most unconventional comedian since Gallagher.Maybe. 9. Russell Brand why: Obnoxious, loud and very strange. Known as much for his off stage antics than his comedy. But one of the best young 'angry' comedians out there. Although there's a sneaking suspicion the accent makes him cool (er). 8. Robin Williams why: Back in2002 with LIVE on Broadway, the show broke several records for a comedy show. Showed he's still funny, hasn't let success go to his head and can still make it all up on the spot. 7. Ricky Gervais why: In the Office for the first part of the century, everywhere else for the last. Most people know him for his film roles, but he's great on the stage too. Doesn't shy away from the controversial topics. And it isn't

Best Films of the Decade - 2010s - Third Part

11. Get Out (2017)-  Directed and written by  Jordan Peele. Horror seems to be an excellent medium to describe racism and it's somewhat amazing how obvious it seems in hindsight. One of the best debuts of a director in recent times, with a script that amps up the tension marvelously and serves up a twist in the tale that was impossible to see coming. Normally horror movies are seen as niche, but this film was popular with the wide audience and also at the award ceremonies further proving everyone was able to be captured by the film's quality. There has been talk of the film fitting into horror-comedy, probably due to Peele's comedy background, but while it is never laughably funny but does serve as a clever satire on the state of racial affairs. 12. The Death of Stalin (2017) - Directed by  Armando Iannuci.  Written by  Armando Iannuci, David Schneider and Ian Martin. Few topics are as ripe for satire as the workings of communist governments (provided one can

Best Films of the Decade - 2010s - Second Part

As always, a giant list. The first 10 can be pretty much interchangeable depending on my mood. 21.  John Wick (2014) - Directed by  Chad Stalehski . Written by  Derek Kolstad.   Keanu Reeves already had experience as the face of an action franchise but it's possible in the future that we remember more for John Wick than as Neo. A film that came out of almost nowhere and managed to simultaneously be a homage and a way forward for action movies. Building off of an extensive source of knowledge of the films of John Woo, Jean Pierre Melville, anime and spaghetti westerns, it's the closest anyone has come to replicating the Gun-Fu Hong Kong classics. The well crafted world of John Wick keeps expanding too, with even more additions to the series in the works. Long may it continue. 22.  Blade Runner 2049 (2017) - Directed by  Denis Villeneuve . Written by  Michael Green  and  Hampton Fancher.   A sequel to one of the most beloved and acclaimed sci-film films of