Skip to main content

Everybody Wants Some- A Review




Richard Linklater’s films always make the viewer conscious of time, whether it’s the years represented in Boyhood or the hours that go by in Before Sunrise. Everybody Wants Some details the weekend before the start of semester for a group of college baseball players. Linklater has stated that he considers the film to be the spiritual sequel to Boyhood but in tone and style it definitely reminds one of Linklater’s 1993 comedic masterpiece Dazed and Confused.

The film is quite light on plot but overall follows freshman pitcher Jake as he interacts with his teammates and navigates his first college weekend. It’s extremely heavy on the conversation and as expected for the director (possibly the best writer of dialogue in current cinema?) the characters go over ideas of varying magnitude which seem to be relevant on a universal level. Sure, the characters aren’t discussing the biggest ideas in the world but the philosophies somehow seem to be profound.

There’s no real story arc in the film. The characters don’t come up against a huge obstacle to overcome nor do they learn deep insights along the way. While it might seem meandering if that’s done wrong, in this case it’s refreshing. The entire film seems like one fun rush of hanging out with the guys. It’s an almost wholly male dominated film but perhaps by being set in 1980 it seems to be less of an aggressive masculinity that’s channel and more of a mellow and chill type. It’s an important feature because if the characters were all entitled, misogynist stereotypes of athletes the film wouldn’t work at all. So there can’t be enough praise for writing characters that are multi-dimensional (and likeable).



Managing to fit a multitude of distinct and memorable characters can easily overwhelm a film (or worse, the characters don’t manage to be memorable) but the film finds the balance in putting the right amount of each character in. From the smooth-talking Finn, aggressively talented McReynolds to the team’s designated outcast Niles, who has a habit of going on rants and treating everything way too seriously, there isn’t a single character who doesn’t seem to fit into the film (even if several are trying to figure out how to fit into the team). In fact, the characters and their antics are so much of a draw that it’s almost the end of the film before there’s any baseball at all. And even if there hadn’t been any, it’s unlikely anyone would have really clamoured to see more baseball despite the guys talking about the sport fairly regularly.

The fact that the film is set in 1980 definitely plays a big role. It’s a decade that’s currently popular for nostalgia as Stranger Things and the Ghostbusters reboot have shown. Whether the 1980s were a more hopeful time is probably a personal opinion but it does seem written as this is so. Dale, the team’s only black player, never says a single thing about his race and neither do any of his teammates. It’s all written in the sense of acceptance. And, being the 1980s, music plays a huge role in setting the scene and the soundtrack for this film may be one of the best for the year.

I’d easily place it as an instant classic and the only reason it isn’t in the top five of Linklater’s films is that this is the same director who’s done the Before trilogy, Boyhood and Waking Life (which shares some of the philosophizing upon ideas style that this film has , especially in the bong scene). It’s still September but Everybody Wants Some has a strong case to be one of the best comedies of the year. Thoroughly enjoyable watching and fun from start to fin

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

a list about plays (post 1950)

The general perception is good plays stopped being written. That all the plays being performed which remain popular are classics and there is no place for the playwright in the current dramatic world. The role of the playwright has been diminished but good plays have not become extinct in the 20th and 21st century.This list will attempt to reflect that by giving a selection of excellent plays written (and performed) after 1950. 20. Prelude to a Kiss- Craig Lucas. Premiered in California in 1988. Quick Description: Thought to be a metaphor for AIDS. A story about the switching of bodies between a new bride and an old man and how the husband must find the old man while keeping his love alive. Something of a Sci-fi style and one of the most original works in recent times. 19. Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill.premiered in Stockholm at the Royal Dramatic theatre in 1956. quick summary: A play about addiction and how it affects everyone around the addict.The characters ...

Travel Writings- Rome (I)

Rome is a cliché. Usually that isn’t a good thing but when the cliché is that a city is cool, full of life and gorgeous, the clichés can stay. Rome is possibly the only European capital that can claim to rival Paris in the popular imagination in terms of having an expectation around it. Even Paris is now succumbing to parallel narratives due to the sheer size of the city (much like London), with the immigrant experience less of an unknown story (to non-immigrants anyway. Immigrants always knew it wasn’t cities paved with gold they’d find). Some combination of smaller population, less immigration and the weight of centuries of civilization being still visible across the city has allowed Rome to actually deserve the tag of “The Eternal City”.   My idea of Rome comes to me primarily from Italian films of the 1960s. Rome is black and white in my mind just as it is on Fellini’s film reel. I had low expectations. Months in London had allowed cynicism to set in...