Skip to main content

Selection Day: A Review

Selection Day: A Review




Aravind Adiga has a reputation as a chronicler of the ambition of the Indian masses to bridge the gap of inequality. In this, his third novel, the scope is once again on the effort of members of the lower classes trying to make it into the exclusive world of privilege but this time the author goes about it by focusing on modern India’s great love: cricket.

 Few things are more representative of the aspirations of the Indian masses than the dream to be a cricketer. IPL success stories capture the entire nation's attention and this allows the writer to detail another familiar Indian character, the entrepreneur who sees brilliant opportunities everywhere. The cricketers are Radha and his younger brother Manju, both exceedingly talented and continuously bullied by their father, who has made a contract with God that his son’s will be the best and second best batsmen in the wold. They make a less divine contract with Anand Metha who sponsors them in return for a percentage of their future earnings.

The novel is not a straight story on the pressure of schoolboy cricket and the potential for it to change the lives of those who would be invisible. Though there’s enough in that theme for an entire novel, Adiga expands further by introducing the character of Javed, a wealthy teammate of Manju who attempts to have the younger brother to attempt to make his own path in life instead of doing what his father has prescribed.  Manju’s confusion and difficulties with his adolescent sexuality is one of the main drivers of the novel but unfortunately, it’s also one of the more thinly written parts of the novel. Perhaps it’s intentional but it seemed as though there was the potential to write deeper scenes of emotional conflict. When compared to the depth at which Metha philosophizes on the state of India and the Indian people every time he appears, it seems like a missed opportunity to not develop the poignancy of the Javed and Manju story.

A more character-focused author would have made the father of the boys, Mohan, the lead character of the novel. With his maniacal devotion to having his sons become the best, coupled with his bizarre superstitions (“No shaving before turning 21 as it releases hormones into the body”) he’s easily the most memorable character in the novel. Unfortunately his presence becomes rarer as the novel progresses and though this is necessary for the story’s progression, one does wish to see more of him.

The novel is extremely readable and the prose flows with great verve, making it possible to read the novel from start to finish without interruption. The problem with such a book is that when there’s no reason to stop and think about things the book can be a bit forgettable. The character of Metha is one of the most cliché, in the sense that he’s an entrepreneur who drinks a lot and doesn’t enjoy members of his social class and by having him spout drunken speeches regularly it becomes possible to gloss over the character, which is unfortunate because he delivers some of the best lines in the novel (He thinks cricket exists “to pacify hundreds of millions of desperately horny young Indians of the lower social classes”).


The entire novel is mostly well-written and like Adiga’s previous works serve as a broad satire on aspects on India, especially class-mobility. The scope of the novel is exceedingly ambitious and occasionally the writing doesn’t seem to convey the entirety of the ideas. But ignoring those occasional missteps, the novel remains entertaining and worth reading. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Predictions-Film Awards (i)

Best Director Most likely winner :     Steven Spielberg   for Lincoln. Leaving out Ben Affleck, Kathryn Bigelow and Quentin Tarantino pretty much made this Spielberg's to lose. And doesn't reflect too well on the Academy either. Backup Pick :    David O. Russell for  Silver Linings Playbook. The production company of Weinstein have been campaigning hard for this and it's a good film with the acting performances set up well. The thing about best director is it's the easiest award to give to someone the academy likes because it's ambiguous and the academy doesn't really love Russell. Most deserving :      Michel Haneke for  Amour. Haneke has the most carefully crafted film here. All in all it is definitely his film in every scene. His presence is all around the film and it is an excellent film. If they give it for the greatest impact a director has on the film, this is it. Best Adapted Screenplay Most li...

a list about plays (post 1950)

The general perception is good plays stopped being written. That all the plays being performed which remain popular are classics and there is no place for the playwright in the current dramatic world. The role of the playwright has been diminished but good plays have not become extinct in the 20th and 21st century.This list will attempt to reflect that by giving a selection of excellent plays written (and performed) after 1950. 20. Prelude to a Kiss- Craig Lucas. Premiered in California in 1988. Quick Description: Thought to be a metaphor for AIDS. A story about the switching of bodies between a new bride and an old man and how the husband must find the old man while keeping his love alive. Something of a Sci-fi style and one of the most original works in recent times. 19. Long Day's Journey Into Night - Eugene O'Neill.premiered in Stockholm at the Royal Dramatic theatre in 1956. quick summary: A play about addiction and how it affects everyone around the addict.The characters ...

Travel Writings- Rome (I)

Rome is a cliché. Usually that isn’t a good thing but when the cliché is that a city is cool, full of life and gorgeous, the clichés can stay. Rome is possibly the only European capital that can claim to rival Paris in the popular imagination in terms of having an expectation around it. Even Paris is now succumbing to parallel narratives due to the sheer size of the city (much like London), with the immigrant experience less of an unknown story (to non-immigrants anyway. Immigrants always knew it wasn’t cities paved with gold they’d find). Some combination of smaller population, less immigration and the weight of centuries of civilization being still visible across the city has allowed Rome to actually deserve the tag of “The Eternal City”.   My idea of Rome comes to me primarily from Italian films of the 1960s. Rome is black and white in my mind just as it is on Fellini’s film reel. I had low expectations. Months in London had allowed cynicism to set in...